Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere

Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 27, 2020	Good article nominee	Not listed
January 6, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (2 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

electrosphere

In the article it says "It could also load itself through an available connection into the Electrosphere or enemy aircraft." but prior that is nowhere explained what Electrosphere is. Anyone? 83.150.117.22 (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

remake

I hope they make a remake for the game now that would be great. I am trying to get my own version of the japanese one (Who cares if you have no clue as to what they're saying its better than the U.S. one).Sam ov the blue sand 02:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're attempting to translate the Japanese version of the game - check out http://projectnemo.net. Thanks! - ImranC —Preceding unsigned comment added by ImranC (talk • contribs) 20:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jaeger/Yaeger?

I clearly saw from the profile file that Erich's name is Erich Jaeger, as in MGS' Frank Jaeger. How come it's refernced to be a misspelling of Yeager? Dr. Rondart 19:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Dr. RondartDr. Rondart 19:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No clue. ^_^Sam ov the blue sand 05:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it's jaeger :) Outrunno (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ace Combat 3 → Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere — This is the proper name for this game. —Mika1h 13:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support This is uncontroversial, so I don't see the problem. DS9 Voyager 02:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There's no need to include subtitle. Omission of subtitle is common ("Ace Combat 3" -"Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere"). As there are no other article named "Ace Combat 3", there's no problem about preciseness either. Are there any guidelines which say subtitles should be included? --Kusunose 05:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 06:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperlinks to non english page.

The hyperlinks labled New Space Order lead to a non english article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.52.27 (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Because the majority of Ace Combat game articles feature subtitles (Ace Combat 04: Shattered Skies, Ace Combat X: Skies of Deception, etc.) feature sub-titles, and moreover Ace Combat 3 is referred to by its full name as their official titles on respected video game sites (IGN, GameSpot) I propose we repoen the discussion that the Ace Combat 3 article be moved to Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere. --Hydrokinetics12 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second. It should include the subtitle like the articles of the other titles in the series. pmt7ar ^(t|c) 04:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i also second. a wikipedia search for electrosphere immediatly forwards the searcher to the page ioniosphere — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.28.249.21 (talk) 10:58, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. ~SlyCooperFan1 23:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Audio

Some info can be added about it's OST, 「Ace Combat 3: Electroshpere Direct Audio」 -vgmdb. pmt7ar ^(t|c) 21:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 12:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ace Combat 3 → Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere – All other games in the series with subtitles are referred to on Wikipedia including their subtitle; see Ace Combat 04: Shattered Skies, Ace Combat 5: The Unsung War, etc. The subtitle "Electrosphere" should be included in this article for consistency with the other games as described at WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. Additionally, as stated in previous discussions, respected gaming sites such as IGN and GameSpot refer to Ace Combat 3 with the subtitle in the name; see IGN's page here and GameSpot's page here. I propose we re-open and get a final consensus one way or the other on this move discussion. ~SlyCooperFan1 23:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support to match the rest of the series. There is no clear common name, but there is nothing to be lost from having a consistent naming scheme for the franchise. O N R (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Lone primary sources and verifiability

I asked this at the main Ace Combat article, and I’m asking here, too. The claims about UGSF (and AC3’s inclusion in it) seem to be attributable only to a single primary source written in Japanese. There doesn’t seem to be any coverage of it, in any language, outside of fansites and forums. Is this verifiable enough and encyclopedic enough to remain? —174.141.182.82 (talk) 00:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, any objections to removing that paragraph? It is sourced, but if true, it seems a pretty big deal that should be verifiable by secondary sources, and it doesn’t appear to be. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 04:21, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked with any of the interpreters that I recommended? Scr★pIron^IV 04:34, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. See Talk:Ace Combat. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 03:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: [1] Care to comment here? —174.141.182.82 (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I’m taking the liberty of cross-posting ScrapIron’s relevant comments here:

The source you had provided, while a non-english and primary source, was supported by blogs and fan sites. This may not be optimal, but it is adequate, particularly considering the subject. We are dealing with a series of video games, not the biography of a hero or the history of a piece of world-changing engineering. The availability of sources is dependent upon the importance of the subject. What we have is probably as good as is available. So, relax a bit, and offer information instead of stressing over it. This is an article about a series of video games on Wikipedia; no one will live or die based upon the inclusion of this trivial information on a trivial subject. —originally posted to User talk:ScrapIronIV 04:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

—174.141.182.82 (talk) 21:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed an unsourced paragraph

The following paragraph has been flagged as needing citation for two and a half years, so I’ve taken the liberty of removing it:

However, in planning the North American/European release on March 22, 2000, Namco Hometek cut out all of the Japanese version's anime cutscenes and related voiceovers, and limited the branching 52-mission storyline to just 36 missions in a linear storyline. Officials said the content in the Japanese version was not important to the game, but Namco Bandai spokesman Naoto Maeda later hinted at a possible remake if there is enough demand and various issues can be resolved.

Also, it seems bad form to begin a paragraph with a conjunctive adverb (“however”) which refers to a preceding paragraph. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]